<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Oliver + S | Anne Stoye | Activity</title>
	<link>https://oliverands.com/community/members/acs19/activity</link>
	<atom:link href="https://oliverands.com/community/members/acs19/activity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Anne Stoye.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 03:25:30 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">00f515fd7917493196e5949e7939f4e6</guid>
				<title>Anne Stoye replied to the topic Help on size in the forum liesl + co: belgravia knit dress</title>
				<link>https://oliverands.com/community/forums/topic/help-on-size#post-75202</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2020 12:50:43 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for clarifying the negative ease.  But why not negative ease on the standard sizing too? (same design, same fabric choices but less &#8220;fluff&#8221; at/near wearer&#8217;s waist).  If both size ranges had negative ease I would have understood this as a design choice (though might still have worried about room at the waist) but the numbers&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-174839"><a href="https://oliverands.com/community/forums/topic/help-on-size#post-75202" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">edbee4747aa952a0c4c2d2770b3a8d8f</guid>
				<title>Anne Stoye replied to the topic Help on size in the forum liesl + co: belgravia knit dress</title>
				<link>https://oliverands.com/community/forums/topic/help-on-size#post-75200</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 18:25:51 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for getting back to me.</p>
<p>My measurements are almost exactly the extended size 16 (do you need a tester?) and the change to the shoulder and bust dart are likely to be just what I need.  But the garment waist on the extended size 16 Belgravia will be too small at 34.5 inches (whereas the waist on the normal size 16 will be fine but snug,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-174837"><a href="https://oliverands.com/community/forums/topic/help-on-size#post-75200" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a55a1480cf46ee4b1023cb476a8a44b5</guid>
				<title>Anne Stoye replied to the topic Help on size in the forum liesl + co: belgravia knit dress</title>
				<link>https://oliverands.com/community/forums/topic/help-on-size#post-75197</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 18:00:04 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to pester you about this issue.  I am not sure if you are investigating the discrepancy I have raised or whether you consider the subject closed.  I am happy to take the discussion off the website and suggest you send me a private email.</p>
<p>Your article about the extended sizing says:<br />
&#8220;We’ve also increased the waist and hips in the expanded s&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-174831"><a href="https://oliverands.com/community/forums/topic/help-on-size#post-75197" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e8d5195e1678d584faae92534d90aa34</guid>
				<title>Anne Stoye replied to the topic Help on size in the forum liesl + co: belgravia knit dress</title>
				<link>https://oliverands.com/community/forums/topic/help-on-size#post-75190</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2020 19:51:41 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for your reply.  However, I think that the issue may be the finished garment measurement at the waist.  It makes no sense to me to have positive ease at the waist for the standard sizing and negative ease (with same fabric type) for the extended sizing.  The helpful article you referenced effectively confirmed the body&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-174830"><a href="https://oliverands.com/community/forums/topic/help-on-size#post-75190" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bad6553347d02e7de69ee5c7e250b2de</guid>
				<title>Anne Stoye replied to the topic Help on size in the forum liesl + co: belgravia knit dress</title>
				<link>https://oliverands.com/community/forums/topic/help-on-size#post-75188</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2020 10:10:25 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to make the Belgravia and am baffled by the sizing measurements.  I need to decide which size range to buy.  The garment waist measurement supplied for size 16 in the extended sizing is less than body measurement (but more than body measurement in the standard sizes).  Please could you check and clarify both sets of measurements (body and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-174828"><a href="https://oliverands.com/community/forums/topic/help-on-size#post-75188" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d2e1a5a852e91a0502902353d8bc970d</guid>
				<title>Anne Stoye became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://oliverands.com/community/activity/p/174826</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2020 09:55:57 -0400</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>